The Application of Seller Strict Liability for Non-Conformity of Fashion Products in Transactions Conducted Through Instagram
Keywords:
Consumer Protection, E-commerce, Instagram, Fashion, Business Actor LiabilityAbstract
The development of information technology has transformed conventional trade patterns into internet-based digital commerce, including the fashion sector through social media platforms such as Instagram. This transformation provides convenience for both business actors and consumers in conducting transactions; however, it also gives rise to legal issues, particularly regarding discrepancies between products received by consumers and those advertised. This study aims to analyze the forms of business actors’ liability and identify the obstacles faced by consumers in claiming their rights over fashion products that do not match the advertisements on Instagram. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, which are examined through library research and analyzed qualitatively-normatively to obtain a systematic understanding of consumer legal protection in digital transactions. The findings show that business actors bear legal responsibility in the form of refunds, product replacement, and compensation when the products received do not correspond to those advertised, as regulated under the Consumer Protection Law and the Civil Code. However, in practice, consumers face various obstacles, such as limited transaction evidence, low legal literacy, weak bargaining positions, ineffective dispute resolution mechanisms, and the lack of adequate transaction protection systems on social media platforms. This study concludes that although consumer protection regulations already exist, their implementation in fashion transactions through Instagram is still not optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, improve public legal literacy, and enhance the active role of digital platforms in creating a safer and more equitable trading system.
References
Amerini, I., Barni, M., Battiato, S., Bestagini, P., Boato, G., Bruni, V., Caldelli, R., Natale, F. De, Nicola, R. De, Guarnera, L., Orrù, G., Ortis, A., Perazzo, P., Puglisi, G., & Purnekar, N. (2025). Deepfake Media Forensics : Status and Future Challenges. 1–42.
Angelia, K., & Pratiwi, Y. (2025). Mystery Box Transactions on the Tokopedia Marketplace : A Legal Analysis of Consumer Protection in Indonesian Civil Law. 4(4). https://doi.org/10.30999/ph.v6i1.2810.3
Buana, A. P., Tjolleng, A., & Aswari, A. (2021). Legal Aspects The Use of Dashboard Cameras as an Effort to Develop Traffic Law. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 1(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v1i1.163
Darmawanto, D., Bima, M. R., & Ramadhan, M. F. (2025). Catching the Perpetrators of Dangerous Cosmetics : Between Intention and Absolute Responsibility. 2(1), 1–13.
Dickinson, G. M. (n.d.). Dark Patterns and Consumer Protection Law for App Makers.
Fayyaz, U., & Jumani, T. A. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Deepfake Detection Techniques : From Traditional Machine Learning to Advanced Deep Learning Architectures.
Hatta, M., Rajamanickam, R., Abdullah, D., Hartono, H., Saleh, A. A., Djanggih, H., Bunga, M., Wahab, M., Susena, K. C., Abbas, I., Aswari, A., & Sriadhi, S. (2018). Internet and Terrorism in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012080
Kolb, R., & Gazzini, T. (2021). Catalonia independence claim : An analysis from the standpoint of international law. June, 4–37.
Marx, J., & Germies, J. (2021). Conscious Commerce – Digital Nudging and Sustainable E-commerce Purchase Decisions. 1–11.
Muliawan, A., & Maharani, D. T. (2026). Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce Reviewed from the Aspect of Contractual Liability in Marketplace Platforms. 5(2), 1576–1589.
Nugroho, E. N., Alief, M. M., & Dyfa, N. N. (2026). Analisis Regulasi Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Platform E- Commerce atas Barang Palsu di Marketplace. 4(5), 3134–3140.
Ramadhan, M. F., Nawi, S., Khalid, H., & Abbas, I. (2026). The Nature of Legal Regulations on The Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Plantation Project. 11(1), 3001–3006.
Septian, F., Rahmatiar, Y., Abas, M., Studi, P., Hukum, I., Hukum, F., Buana, U., & Karawang, P. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM. 6(2), 616–623.
Siregar, P. A. S., & Jambak, P. R. (2026). LEGAL LIABILITY FOR LOST GOODS PURCHASED ONLINE UNDER A PERSONAL SHOPPER SERVICE AGREEMENT. 7(1), 1362–1369.
Syarif, M., Busthami, D. S., Hidjaz, M. K., & Aswari, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum ( Legal Research Methods ). 1.
Wu, Q., Sang, Y., Wang, D., & Lu, Z. (2019). Case Study of Alibaba ’ s Taobao and ByteDance ’ s TikTok. Woodstock ’18: ACM Symposium on Neural Gaze Detection, June 03â•fi05, 2018, Woodstock, NY, 1(1), 1–30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azizah Putri Sulthan, Andi Istiqlal Assaad, Jasmaniar Jasmaniar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
